Wednesday, 18 January 2017

Regional Stereotypes
Regional identity refers to the part of the United Kingdom someone is from. It can refer to general areas or specific towns.



























































I watched Harry Enfiled's regional stereotype of Scousers which included the following: 
Aggressive attitudes
Afros and Moustaches


BREAD
TOP BOY
DOWNTON ABBEY
YOUNG ONES
SHAMELESS
WATERLOO ROAD
GEORDIE SHORE
TOWIE
SKINS
MADE IN CHELSEA 

Theres a representation of Mancs as always being drunk.
They have a regional Manchester accent.
The location is a council estate.
Foul language.
No self respect

Essex thick and stupid.
Exaggerated speaking, sound as if they are thick.
Vain, self interest.
Party animals.
Elongated words.
Fake tans. 
Sitting comfortable money wise. 


Made in Chelsea
Posh accents
A lot of money
Male grooming
Expensive dresses
Snobby, bitchy 

 

People from Devon, are represented as quite vulnerable people because they are stupid, this makes them a target for bullying, they are shown as awkward people who are 'backwards' but try to fit in. (Misfits)

Shown as powerful and influential, they have a neutral accent and are clear when talking. They brush up well and always look at their best. Have high roles in society, very wealthy people.

Wednesday, 11 January 2017

Representation of Disability

  1. What dramas can you think of that have disabled people in them? Game of Thrones, Glee
  2. What do you think of when you think of disability? People who are either physically or mentally challenged.
    There are 770,00 disabled children under the age of 16 in the UK. That equates to 1 child in 20.
Nearly one in five people of working age (7 million, or 18.6%) in Great Britain have a disability.



What is the medical model of disability (Shakespeare)

The Medical Model: Shakespeare (1999)
The media throughout history has depicted disability through the use of impairment, Shakespeare points out in his article about disability in film
"impairment is made the most important thing" and disabled characters are "objectified and distanced from the audience".

How does this affect the way the disabled are presented? 

People with disabilities are known for their disabilities and so you do not really get close to the person.
The media has focused on portraying impairment through the influence of the medical model of disability

(The disabled person as pitiable or pathetic)
disabled people's inability to interact in normal daily life is a direct result of their physical and/ or mental impairment.
e.g. Charles Dickens "A Christmas Carole” "crippled" child of Bob Cratchit, Tiny Tim, is defined by his disability and will only survive through medical intervention.

We tend to pity the disabled as we can tell they are challenged whether it be physical and mental. This can be quite patronising because it encourages an 'us and them society'.
Annotate within this an analysis of the following clips

James Bond disabled villains:
Le Chriffe has a blood condition
Bloefeld he has a scar down his face
Jaws he was very strong but mentally challenge character 
Dr. No was missing two hands
Da Silva cyanide pill didn't kill him and disfigured his face  

Why is this clip funny?
It was funny because it was very slapstick. 
How is the disabled girl represented?
She's represented as pathetic and vulnerable.
Are we meant to be laughing at the disabled person?
From the way that the attention is heavily centred on her I feel as if her reaction and 
the way she acts afterwards, I feel she is meant to be the brunt of the joke.
Are they the ‘butt’ of the joke?
"
How do you think disabled people respond to this?
I think everyone would be very shocked and offended as they have represented disability in a rather stereotypical way as
someone in a wheelchair who is also mentally challenged.
In what way does the representation comply with Shakespeares  STEREOTYPE!
''
Are we as society being cultivated to think that we should pity disability?
Yes, because they are represented as those who struggle and so you feel as if help is needed for them and that causes pity.

Why is this clip funny?
Because Warwick Davis is struggling to move a washing machine which is as tall as him.
How is Warwick Davis represented?
He's represented as unable to participate in everyday life as he struggles to perform a task that the woman performs
so easily.
Are we meant to be laughing at the disabled person?
Yes and no because the real joke is about how worker can be lazy and won't do their jobs properly and that the 'dizzy
blonde' didn't tell him about the washing machine but yes because when he falls over it adds slapstick.
Are they the ‘butt’ of the joke?
No
How many of Paul Hunt’s (1991) stereotypes does this clip comply with?  
Laughable
Unable to participate in everyday life
Burden
Pitiable 
In what way does the representation comply with Shakespeares  STEREOTYPE!
Are we as society being cultivated to think that we should pity disability?




·       Inbetweeners: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvTgvEzpSzQ
Life’s too short https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jtTjfEW7iQ




Tuesday, 10 January 2017

Alan Cameron Narrative Theory



LUTHER

LUTHER 

TODOROV
This is the theory that every film or narrative follows the same pattern. Equilibrium, disequilibrium, acknowledgement, solution. In Luther season 4 episode 1 and 2 there are several narratives. The first being between Alice Morgan and our Hero Luther, Alice is found to be dead and so Luther does his best to solve her murder. In this instance the equilibrium is Luther living peacefully in his home by the coast, the disequilibrium is him finding out that Alice has died in a car 'accident', that meant she drowned in a river, the acknowledgement is Luther realising that her death was not an accident but in fact a murder. However, Luther does not really follow Todorov's theory as Luther's tracking down of Alice's killer leads him into another disequilibrium and another narrative. This is when he kidnaps George Cornelius and so when he escapes a bounty is put on his head, putting Luther in trouble. 
Simultaneously there is another narrative running along side, with Stephen Rose murdering and eating specific parts of peoples bodies and Leo and Emma chasing him down, this of course is the disequilibrium but this is then followed by another disequilibrium when Leo is killed in an explosion and so Luther has to join the case and so both narratives are fused together. The acknowledgement of this narrative is when they come to the understanding that Stephen has Cotard delusion where the affected person believes they are dead and have lost their internal organs and so the specific body parts that Stephen is eating are to make up what he's lost. 
There is another disequilibrium in the Alice-Luther story when a girl named Megan claims to have a message for Luther from Alice, which questions whether she is actually dead. The acknowledgement comes when Megan claims she is psychic. However, this again leads into another disequilibrium as it turns out Megan is using Luther so that he actually fulfils the promise he gave to her as a little girl that he'd protect her from Stacey. Then the George and Luther narratives overlap when Luther has to cut his and Megan's chat short over fear of another hit. 
There is then another disequilibrium in the Stephen Rose narrative as he kidnaps his ex-girlfriend and her children. There is then a solution to this narrative when Emma puts a bullet in Stephen's head as revenge for killing Leo. Luther then finds Megan's safety deposit box with diamonds and the phones she stole to keep an eye on Luther.
The George Cornelius, Luther, Alice and Megan narratives all overlap when Luther gives George the diamonds Alice was going to sell so she and Luther could run away and in return the hit is called off and Luther asks for drugs and pills. The solution the Megan and Luther narrative is found as Luther stuffs the drugs in the owl teddy bear. Stacey is then arrest with intent to supply but the teddy will link her to a murder she committed. There is then a semi-solution to the Alice-Luther-megan story as Megan admits to murdering Alice but there is then a disequilibrium again as Luther vows to get Megan. 

PROPP
The Villain(s)- Stephen, George and Stacey all of these characters become problems for Luther as they are all at the head of the cases for him to solve.
The Donor-
The Helper- Emma, Leo, George they all play big parts in him providing a solution to the problems. For example, Emma kills Stephen and prevents the death of his ex girlfriend and George gives Luther the drugs to farm Stacey.
The Princess- Alice Morgan she is Luther's love interest and is the reason he resumes his line of work.
The Father- 
The Dispatcher- Megan and Leo. When Leo dies it brings Luther back into the case and Megan gives Luther the reason to frame Stacey. 
The Hero- Luther he is the main protagonist of the series as it revolves around his life and he is pinnacle is the solving and conclusion of each case. 
The Anti-Hero - Luther does not always do the right thing like when he kidnapped George but he has the right intention.
The False Hero- Megan, she at first seems to be Luther's friend giving him information about the case which is close to his heart but she is actually using him for her case and it turns out she killed his lover. 
BARTHE
Proairetic Code- This is shown when Stephen pulls a knife out on his ex-girlfriend and you think he is going to stab her. 

Semantic Code- The fridge- normally just seen as an everyday appliance but when it explodes on Leo it becomes a source of fear. So when Luther approaches the fridge tension builds as people believe its a bomb. 
The Dead Bird- This foreshadows the events of what will happen to the woman as she throws the bird out.

Enigma Code- At the end of episode one, Megan has a message for Luther from Alice, this frustrates audiences as they are left questioning whether she is alive or dead. 

Referential Code- This would refer to the Cotard delusion which is a mental illness where the affected person believes they are dead. 

Monday, 9 January 2017

Barthes' Theory

Barthes' Narative Theory


ILL MANORS


Ill Manors

Description: Macintosh HD:Users:11208920:Desktop:Screen Shot 2017-01-03 at 09.26.04.png

Box Office: 453,570 GBP
Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb, 79% Rotten Tomatoes, 4.6/5 Time Out
Producers: BBC Films
Plot Synopsis:
Ill Manors is a crime/drama set in the UK. Written, directed and co-scored by Ben Drew (Plan B), the film follows eight main characters over the course of a week as each one tries to fight for respect and stay alive.  The film is set in Forest Gate, London where Plan B grew up and it is based on true events that Drew had read in the newspaper or from stories that he had heard from his friends.

Media Theory:
At the beginning of the film there is fast paced editing and the footage is fast forward showing various different scenes and how they are all connected. Within the scenes you can see young people making, using and selling drugs. Acland’s theory (1995) suggests that the media use more negative stories of youth to emphasise how not to behave in adulthood and so the media can enforce a middle class hegemony. This is clearly illustrated in the opening of the film as you can see the youth acting recklessly and dangerously. There is a match on action when Aaron leaves the woods after running away from the police. This links to Hebdige’s theory (1979) that the media either represent the youth as either fun or trouble and that you never get to see the hard working teens. This is shown through in this scene as Aaron is a drug dealer and has narrowly escaped trouble with the police. There is a fade when Kirby is talking to Aaron and something reminds him of his past and it flashes back to when he was a young man and be released from jail. This links back to Acland’s theory (1995), as the media is showing the youth what not to do because you will become like Kirby.

Early on in the film you can see a long shot of a young pregnant woman-smoking weed. Ann Gould studied the representation of youth in 1999 and came up with 6 stereotypes. One of these is that all young people are self-destructive and this is clearly displayed within this scene, as the young woman is not only brining harm to herself but also the child that she is carrying. Midway through the film there is a mid-shot of a hooded young boy with a gun in his hand. This represents Greg Philo’s stereotype that if you are not part of the middle class you are automatically classed as a thug in a hoodie. The area in which ‘Ill Manor’ is set is a poor part of London where most of the characters are part of the underclass and so are therefore classed as hoodie thugs.  Towards the end of the film there is a high angle/POV where the young boy is looking up at a man holding a gun in his face.  This links to Gerbner’s cultivation theory, that the youth are always the victim of crime on some platform within the media. In the case the boy is the victim of the murder and this fundamentally illustrates another stereotype of the youth that they are vulnerable.


‘Ill Manors’ is set in Forest Gate, London and at the start of the film the use of sets show the poor conditions in which the characters are living this can link to Greg Philo’s theory because they are underclass and so maybe their upbringing and living conditions could have turned them to a life of crime. The costumes that the characters wear, for example ED are very tatty. ED wears a whiter undershirt with a ripped t-shirt over the top, which can connote he has previously been involved in violence and he has a skin head, which can link to Cohen’s theory (1972) that the youth are ‘folk devils’ as they are part of groups and gangs. This can be further illustrated as during one of ED’s flashbacks he is shown to be wearing an England flag and making white power references. This is of course a negative stereotype as it is assuming all young people are prone to expressing extremist ideologies.